Schierloh v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an action for alleged malicious prosecution by civil process. The defendants, who, with the exception of Robert E. Kelly, are members of a firm of attorneys, appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings. They contend that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In that pleading it is alleged, in substance, that defendant Robert E. Kelly, as plaintiff, commenced two actions, in which the firm acted as his attorneys, to set aside certain transfers of real property to the plaintiff, here respondent, by her husband, on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vernes v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Sachs v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Anderson v. CanadaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Looff v. . LawtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Chappelle v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Petrich v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Kauffman v. ShefmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Watson v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.