Legal Opinion
Cushman v. Day
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 5, 1979No. A7805-07992, CA 13541PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
Plaintiffs appeal the judgment order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to all four causes of action alleged in plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. We reverse.
The Second Amended Complaint is taken as true for the purpose of this appeal. It alleges the following facts:
Plaintiffs are police officers employed by the ¡Eugene Police Department. On March 30, 1977, they reported to the scene of a strike by defendant Teamsters Local 670 members against a Eugene business establishment. They were requested by the employer to prevent picketers from obstructing the free flow of traffic and personnel into…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Neiman-Marcus v. LaitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Hinkle v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bock v. ZittenfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Elizabeth Retail Properties LLC v. Keybank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- Scott Miller v. Kshama SawantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Worley v. Oregon Physicians ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Hickey v. SettlemierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.