Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Alexander

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1966PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*268SLOAN, J.

This was a libel action. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. The court allowed a motion for judgment n.o.v. Plaintiff appeals.

Defendant operated a restaurant, plus sleeping facilities, in Estacada which was primarily patronized by loggers working in the area. Frequently he would allow credit to his customers if the employer of the particular customer would agree to pay the bill. Plaintiff was a contract logger. One of plaintiff’s employees obtained credit from defendant and failed to pay. Plaintiff had not previously agreed to pay the bill of this employee. Defendant sought…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hudson v. Pioneer Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Neumann v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Harley-Davidson Motorsports, Inc. v. MarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Marleau v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. ChurchArizona Supreme Court · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API