People v. Beckley
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTHSCHILD, J.
In this opinion we hold that the prosecution’s failure to authenticate a photograph and “gang roster” downloaded from Internet Web sites should have barred their admission but that the errors were harmless as to both defendants. We also conclude there was insufficient evidence to support the street gang enhancement of each defendant’s sentence. We modify the judgments as to each defendant by striking the street gang enhancements. We further modify Darrell Amont Finn’s judgment by striking the gun use enhancements under Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivisions (b) through…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. DoggettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- St. Clair v. Johnny's Oyster & Shrimp, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- United States v. Alrahman Muhammad NewsomeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tienda, Ronnie Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- People v. GoldsmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kinda v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.