Legal Opinion
People v. Cooper
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 2007No. B190720PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAVEZ, J.
The People appeal from the order dismissing the information charging Michael Arthur Cooper with one count of theft from an elder or dependent adult (Pen. Code, § 368, subd. (e)). It was also alleged that he misappropriated in excess of $50,000 within the meaning of section 12022.6, subdivision (a)(1). The People contend that the trial court erred (1) in excluding, in their entirety, two videotaped interviews of the victim on the ground that they violated defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him, as described in Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [158…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. ArauzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.