Legal Opinion

Belgravia Condominium Ass'n v. 1811 Belgravia Associates

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 14, 2014No. 00946; 385 EDA 2014; 446 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MCINERNEY, J.,

— This appeal opinion is submitted relative to this court’s denial of defendant O’Donnell & Naccarato’s (hereinafter “O&N”) post trial motion on November 27, 2013. The Belgravia defendants1 retained defendant O’Donnell & Naccarato (hereinafter “O&N”), a professional engineering firm, to inspect the Belgravia Building, a building being converted to a condominium, and report its finding pursuant to the Uniform Condominium Act, 68 Pa. C. S. §§ 3404, 3411.

The Uniform Condominium Act required the Belgravia defendants to retain an independent architect or engineer to report on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Bilt-Rite Contractors, Inc. v. Architectural StudioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Venosh v. Henzes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API