Legal Opinion
Abascal v. Jarkos
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 21, 2009No. 08-0789-prUnpublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Isidro Abascal appeals pro se from the dismissal of his complaint charging various prison doctors and officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with violations of his constitutional rights. “We re view de novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), construing the complaint liberally, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs favor.” Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc., 282 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir.2002). We also review de novo a district court’s sua sponte dismissal under 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Shomo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mateo v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Akande v. PhilipsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- American Atheists, Inc. v. Port AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Thomas v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- New Hope Family Servs., Inc. v. PooleDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.