Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
I
On appeal the Board contends that statutes of limitation are not applicable to it, as an agent for the State; therefore, the trial court improperly granted Gypsum’s motion for summary judgment.
The purpose of summary judgment . . . [is] to bring litigation to an early decision on the merits without the delay and expense of a trial where it can be readily demonstrated that no material facts are in issue. Two types of cases are involved: (a) Those where a claim or defense is utterly baseless in fact, and (b) those where only a question of law on the indisputable facts is in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Kermit Lumber & Pressure Treating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Mt. Lebanon School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.