Legal Opinion

Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1987No. 8719SC24PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

I

On appeal the Board contends that statutes of limitation are not applicable to it, as an agent for the State; therefore, the trial court improperly granted Gypsum’s motion for summary judgment.

The purpose of summary judgment . . . [is] to bring litigation to an early decision on the merits without the delay and expense of a trial where it can be readily demonstrated that no material facts are in issue. Two types of cases are involved: (a) Those where a claim or defense is utterly baseless in fact, and (b) those where only a question of law on the indisputable facts is in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Kermit Lumber & Pressure Treating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Mt. Lebanon School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API