Legal Opinion

Brant v. Sorrells

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1987No. 87-117PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

A jury returned a defendant’s verdict in this wrongful death case. The trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. We affirm.

On Monday night, at about 10:00 p.m., Jeff Sorrells, the nineteen year old victim, phoned Diana Brant, the defendant’s seventeen year old daughter, and said that he needed to talk to her, in person, about something very important. Jeff lived across the street, and he and Diana had been friends since childhood. Diana told Jeff that she would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Saber Manufacturing Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Schrader v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Eisner v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Bearden v. J.R. Grobmyer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Wilson v. KoberaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API