Legal Opinion

Eisner v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 8, 1999No. CA 98-1271PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Bird, Judge.

On May 12, 1999, this court handed down an unpublished opinion in this case in which we reversed the judge’s order granting appellee Ron Fields a new trial and dismissed the appeal. The appellee has filed a petition for rehearing, and, in response to that petition, we issue this substituted opinion and deny appellee’s petition.

Appellee Ron Fields filed a lawsuit against Fort Smith ophthalmologist Richard Eisner and his clinic, Equivision, Inc., contending that Dr. Eisner committed medical malpractice when he negligently performed bilateral radial keratotomy surgery on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Clayton v. WagnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. PriddySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hogan v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Garnett v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. James Tree & Crane Service, Inc. v. FoughtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Barker v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Thy N. Tran v. Thi T. VoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API