Bearden v. J.R. Grobmyer Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The main issue in this appeal is whether the Trial Court erred in refusing to allow the appellant, Leavon Bearden, to introduce inadmissible evidence to rebut other inadmissible evidence that was before the jury. We hold that the Trial Court did not err in that respect. We also conclude that it was not error to overrule Mr. Bearden’s motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment in favor of appellees J.R. Grobmyer Lumber Co. (“Grobmyer”) and Delsondro Sims.
On a rainy day in September 1994, Leavon Bearden drove his pickup truck west on four-lane Roosevelt Road in Little…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Peters v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Breitenberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Henson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- German-American Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Dovers v. Stephenson Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Nixon v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.