State v. Conners
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.— Hon. William T. Ragland, Judge. (1) When the appeal does not operate to stay the proceedings, the duty of filing a transcript in this court is east upon the appellant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.— Hon. William T. Ragland, Judge. (1) When the appeal does not operate to stay the proceedings, the duty of filing a transcript in this court is east upon the appellant. The punishment assessed against the defendant, namely, ten years imprisonment in the State Penitentiary, does not bring this case within that class which by virtue of the character of the sentence pronounced of itself operates to stay the execution of the judgment of the trial court. Nor is there any record entry showing that the trial court made “an order expressly directing that…
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, P. J. —
At the January term, 1912, of the Hannibal Court of Common Pleas, appellant was convicted of burglary and larceny and his punishment *333assessed at ten years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary, where he is now undergoing punishment; on the same day on which the judgment was rendered he applied for and was granted an appeal to this court; in April, 1912, he filed herein a short form of transcript containing, as is required by the statute, a certified copy of the record entry of the judgment and the order granting the appeal.
Appeal in crimmai By short Method. If, in reviewing this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PieskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State v. ShortSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State v. LeibtigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State v. ChiltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- State v. BaileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- State v. CarrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- State v. OttensmeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.