Legal Opinion
State v. Pieski
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 18, 1913PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Eugene McQuillin, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL.
2Per curiam
Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to perfect same within one year from the date of the granting thereof having been filed on proper and timely notice thereof given by the State, the question is before us.
The appeal herein was granted by the circuit court of the city of St. Louis on the 30th day of September, *7171910. The bill of exceptions was duly filed, and on the 28th day of April, 1911, as shown by the teste of the circuit clerk, the transcript was forwarded to the clerk of this court for filing. The said transcript has not been filed for the reason that…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Grubbs v. ConesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Walton v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Furthman v. McNultaIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Grunow v. MengeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Oakes v. HighNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
4Cited by20 opinions
- Ferguson v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- State v. CernySupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State ex rel. Crawford County R-II School District v. BouseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Landis v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- State v. ConnersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.