Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Donenfeld
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 18, 2005No. AC 25369PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*35 Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this contract action seeking specific performance of the sale of real property, the plaintiffs, Drew Friedman and Nicholas Visconti, appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Irwin Donenfeld. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) determined that the memorandum signed by the parties on April 16, 2002, was not an enforceable contract and (2) failed to conclude that the defendant breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, as found by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Klein v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Fortier v. Newington Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Haggerty v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Atlantic Terra Cotta Co. v. Chesapeake Terra Cotta Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- TD Bank, N.A. v. M.J. Holdings, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Friedman v. DonenfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Friedman v. DonenfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005