Legal Opinion

Davis v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 16, 1885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the Court

Brewer, J.,

(orally.) There are two applications in these cases. One'is for an order of consolidation.

It is the common practice in the federal courts to consolidate cases between the same parties, or between the same interests, wherever time, labor, and expense can be saved. For instance, if a party sues in different actions on half a dozen different notes against the same defendant, while they are separate .causes of action, yet the courts are wont to consolidate them if it appears that the same questions are in issue, and that time, labor, and expense will be saved by consolidation. But they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Tightmeyer v. MongoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AshtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Fenno v. PrimroseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  3. United States v. WellsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1913
  4. McDonnell v. WasenmillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API