Legal Opinion
Commodities Recovery Corp. v. Emery Worldwide
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 6, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-2480PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule 56. After reviewing the submissions of the parties and hearing oral argument, the Court finds that defendant is entitled to summary judgment for the reasons expressed below.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 5, 1988, plaintiff Commodities Recovery Corporation (“Commodities”) contacted Emery Worldwide (“Emery”) to arrange for overnight shipping of a package valued at $42,000. A Commodities’ employee spoke to an Emery representative who told her that Emery would accept a package valued at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Radich v. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Todd Heller, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Williams Dental Co. v. Air Express InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Power Standards Lab, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- E.J. Rogers, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2004
- Zubaz, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.