Legal Opinion
E.J. Rogers, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided September 23, 2004No. 2:04-cv-00153PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
MCKINNEY, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s, United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), Motion to Dismiss the claims of plaintiff, E.J. Rogers, Inc. (“Rogers”). Rogers brought this action against UPS under the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14706, and alternatively for breach of contract. Rogers seeks compensation in the amount of $11,063.40, and reasonable attorney fees. In the instant motion, UPS seeks dismissal of Rogers’ claim. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion.
I.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Rafael Sanjuan and Marcello A. Maviglia v. The American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc., and Stephen C. ScheiberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oak Street Printery, LLC v. Fujifilm North America Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Treiber & Straub, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Treiber & Straub, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- MARSO v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011