Ward v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Roy Dean Ward, who stands convicted of robbery and of the use of a deadly weapon in the commission of that crime, asks that we annul those convictions, claiming that they were procured through perjured testimony, and that the jury was improperly instructed. For reasons hereafter stated, we perceive no error and affirm the convictions.
1. The perjury claim rests upon discrepancies in the testimony of two prosecution witnesses. More particularly, it is asserted that those witnesses committed perjury because of differences between their testimony at preliminary hearing and their testimony…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Sam De Stefano and Edward SpeiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Kelso v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Elizabeth MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Stalley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Polito v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Hooper v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
- Emil v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Krause v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Krause v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990