Legal Opinion

United States v. Sam De Stefano and Edward Speice

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 20, 1973No. 72-1407, 72-1408PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASTLE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellants Sam De Stefano and Edward Speice were convicted by a jury verdict rendered on March 16, 1972 of endeavoring to induce a prospective witness not to testify in a pending federal case, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (1970). On this appeal, defendants have raised many objections to the propriety of the proceedings in the district court. Their major objections are that: 1) the indictment was insufficient to charge a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, 2) the district judge deprived the defendants of their constitutional rights to confront witnesses against them…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Eugene HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Thomas E. VerkuilenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Daniel BifieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy MaggittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API