Department of Transportation v. Burnham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRASWELL, Judge.
The assignments of error consist of three questions which are concerned with evidence on cross-examination, “comparable” tracts of land, and jury instructions.
Robert Ripley, an expert land appraiser for the Burnhams, the defendant-landowners, twice testified that he did not know the sales price of another tract, Camden Woods. During cross-examination when the same question was put a third time, defendants’ objection was overruled, and counsel’s request to “be heard” was denied. Ripley answered, “$115,000.” The reception of this answer was error for which we reverse and order a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Duke Power Co. v. WinebargerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Duke Power Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State Highway Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Durham v. WooCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Piedmont Natural Gas Co. v. KinlawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018