Legal Opinion

Gildersleeve v. New York, N. H. & H. R.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWH, District Judge.

This libel was %led against the above railroad company by tbe owner of the barge Volunteer to recover damages for injuries received by tbe barge between 1 and 2 a. m. of September 5,1895, in running upon the riprap foundation of the southerly rest pier of the railroad bridge over the Connecticut liver at Middle-town, Conn. The barge was going up the river with the flood tide, in tow of the tug Luther C. Ward, upon a hawser about 300 feet long, designing to pass through the east channel of the open,draw. Astern of the Volunteer, and on a hawser of about 300 feet, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. Missouri River Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. St. Louis & St. Paul Packet Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1887
  3. Charleston Bridge Co. v. The John C. SweeneyDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregon Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Tug Go-GetterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
  2. Pilot River Transportation, Inc., Upper River Services, Inc., and Wausau Insurance Companies v. Chicago and North Western Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API