Legal Opinion

In re United Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 2, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 1146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

In 1948, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved1 a plan for the involuntary retirement of preference stock filed by the United Corporation under § 11 (e) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79 et seq. Upon the Commission’s application, this court in 1949 enforced the plan as approved.2 Subsequently, all appeals were either withdrawn or dismissed, and the plan was consummated. Jurisdiction over further proceedings incident to the plan including the payment of fees and expenses was reserved by both the Commission and this court. Fourteen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downing v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. In re United Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of the United Corporation. Joseph B. Hyman, in No. 12151, Randolph Phillips, in Nos. 12157, 12158Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  2. Matter of Engineers Public Service Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Louis Boehm, and Raymond L. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
  3. In re United Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  4. Matter of Engineers Public Service Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Louis Boehm, and Raymond L. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API