Legal Opinion

Sanders v. AT&T

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2007No. 06-30847Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Wanda Sanders appeals the summary judgment awarded Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) on her termination-of-benefits claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (She does not appeal the summary judgment awarded AT&T.)

As an active employee at AT&T, Sanders took medical leave, for a mental disability, under its short-term-disability benefits plan. AT&T was the plan administrator; MetLife, the claims administrator. A medical evaluation of Sanders’ case, performed on behalf of MetLife toward the end of the 52 week period of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ellis v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Sweatman v. Commercial Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. High v. E-Systems Inc LongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Bolton v. City of Dallas TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API