Legal Opinion

Beasock v. Dioguardi Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 21, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiffs decedent was killed when a tire, mounted on an undersized rim, exploded. Defendant Johnny Antonelli, the recapper of the tire, moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to it and the motion was granted. We reverse.

We need not determine here whether a recapper who recaps a tire owned by its customer should be subject to the same liability as a manufacturer. As a recapper of tires, Johnny Antonelli may have breached a duty in negligence owed to plaintiffs decedent. Johnny…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Velez v. Craine & Clark Lumber Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hayes v. RiccardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alley Sports Bar, LLC v. SimplexGrinnell, LPDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
  2. In Re Welding Fume Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  3. Levine v. Sears Roebuck and Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. Witter v. Abell-Howe Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
  5. Clamp v. HalesNew York Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API