Legal Opinion

Clamp v. Hales

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leslie E. Stein, J.

Plaintiffs Thomas Clamp and Mathai George commenced this action, seeking recovery for personal injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile accident. Thereafter, a third-party action was commenced by the coexecutors of the defendant Estate of William Hales (Hales) for contribution/indemnification based upon the alleged negligence of George and his wife. The Georges now move for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint on the basis that Clamp did not sustain a grave injury under Workers’ Compensation Law § 11.

The Georges argue that Clamp was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Raquet v. BraunNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Murdza v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Isabella v. HallockNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Isabella v. KoubekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API