Legal Opinion
Rudenko v. Costello
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 20, 2002No. Docket Nos. 99-2242 (L), 99-2248, 99-2266, 99-2276, 99-2277, 99-2304, 99-2309, 99-2340, 99-2387, 99-2423, 99-2466, 99-2497, 99-2524, 99-2531, 99-2692 and 99-2718PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners in these 16 consolidated appeals, who are New York State (“State”) prisoners seeking vacatur of their convictions for various crimes, appeal from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, denying their petitions for writs of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In most of these cases, the district judge to whom the action was assigned denied the petition in an order adopting, without elaboration, the reasons stated by the state appellate court in affirming the petitioner’s conviction and the reasons…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas Ryan v. David H. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Rudenko v. CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Walker v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Jones v. KeaneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Durden v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.