Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant presents the following question for determination:

“Is a journeyman plumber, duly licensed under the ordinances of a municipality, who furnishes no materials, supplies, or fixtures, but merely works at his trade as a plumber for an hourly wage, engaged in carrying on the business of plumbing and heating contracting, within the provisions of chapter 52 of the Public Laws of 1931, as amended by chapter 224, Public Laws 1939 ?”

He likewise challenges the constitutionality of the law under which he stands indicted for that it is contrary to the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The People v. . MarxNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Asbury v. Town of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Nance v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Muse v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. King v. Town of Chapel HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Bright v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API