Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Roy D. Steen Iii

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 4, 2020No. 52794-4Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two February 4, 2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 52794-4-II Respondent. v. ROY DONALD STEEN, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. CRUSER, J. — Roy D. Steen appeals his judgment and sentence, arguing that (1) the State failed to prove his criminal history by a preponderance of the evidence and the trial court erred in relying on this evidence when it calculated his offender score and (2) the interest accrual provision in his legal financial obligation (LFO) portion of his sentence is no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. HunleyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. In Re CadwalladerWashington Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API