Legal Opinion
Kassim v. City of Schenectady
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided April 24, 2003No. 02-CV-186PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 12, 2002, plaintiff Khaled Kassim, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, brought suit against defendants City of Schenectady and Michael T. Brockbank, alleging that defendants’ seizure of his business and property on April 23, 2001, violated the procedural due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.
After conducting a Rule 16 Conference with the attorneys on both sides, Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece issued a Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order (“UPSO”), which was filed June 12, 2002. (Docket No. 6).…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee v. BFI Waste Systems of Tennessee, LLC, ET AL.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Great Northern Insurance Company v. ADT LLCDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Hassoun v. SearlsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- In re Laundress Marketing and Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- New Falls Corporation v. SoniDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.