Legal Opinion
Tarsio v. Provident Insurance
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 7, 2000No. Civ.A.98-1894PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case involves the denial of insurance coverage by defendant, Provident Life Insurance Company (“Provident”), in connection with a claim submitted by plaintiff, Kenneth Tar-sio (“plaintiff’). The narrow question before the Court is whether defendant exercised “bad faith” in its denial of coverage. The Court has considered the matter, on the papers, pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Ins. v. CarisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Great American Insurance v. Subranni (In Re Tri-State Armored Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Wimberly Allison Tong & Goo, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Great American Insurance Companies, Inc. v. Subranni (In Re Tri-State Armored Services, Inc.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Product Source International, LLC v. Foremost Signature Insurance Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.