Legal Opinion
(HC) Cleveland v. Robertson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 23, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00674Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PIERRE CLEVELAND, No. 2:20-cv-0674 WBS KJN P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JAMES ROBERTSON,1 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action because it 19 was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations ( 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)), and it contains an 20 unexhausted claim ( 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)). Petitioner did not timely…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Andreas Kelly v. Larry Small, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.