Legal Opinion

State v. England

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 10, 2010No. 102,685PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Russell England appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence and his objection to criminal history. England first argues that the trial court should have granted his objection to criminal history where he argued that some of his previous convictions were uncounseled misdemeanors and should not have been aggregated to a felony conviction. England contended that the improper aggregation of his uncounseled prior misdemeanor convictions resulted in a higher criminal history score and, thus, a longer sentence than he should have received.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. GraceySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. State v. RupnickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. State v. DukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API