Legal Opinion

United States v. Martinelli

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 28, 2005No. 02-0623/ARPublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case presents yet another issue arising from the prosecution of servicemembers for violating federal criminal statutes relating to child pornography in the wake of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234, 122 S.Ct. 1389, 152 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002). Specialist Christopher Martinelli’s convictions are based upon violations of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (2000), the same statute that we addressed in United States v. O’Connor, 58 M.J. 450 (C.A.A.F.2003), and in United States v. Mason, 60 M.J. 15…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. FoslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  2. United States v. MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. BallanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
  4. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API