First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee v. Carpenter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Defendant contends that the order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer as frivolous is not appealable. Such a contention does not appear to have been made and ruled on by this court since the decisions in Gianella v. Bigelow, 92 Wis. 267, 65 N. W. 1030, and Jacobs v. Beebe, 95 Wis. 389, 70 N. W. 468, although, in several cases, in which the right to appeal directly from such an order was not challenged, the orders were reviewed. See *32Home Acres Co. v. Swenson-Dibble L. Co. 179 Wis. 556, 192 N. W. 42; Fleischmann v. Reynolds, 216 Wis. 117, 256 N. W. 778; and also Slama v. Dehmel,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McArthur v. MoffetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Williams v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Gilbert v. HoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Milwaukee Steamship Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Liebhauser v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Chippewa Cable Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Quality Outfitters, Inc. v. RiskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Estate of MaurerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Baker v. OnsrudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Direct Service Oil Co. v. Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935