Legal Opinion

Innes v. Beauchene

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1962No. 86PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

The only question to be decided is whether the trial court erred in finding that appellant was a partner in a mining enterprise with Howard Nelson and Charles Baxter.

The complaint was one for wages and named appellant, Nelson and Baxter, d/b/a Swede Nelson Enterprises, as defendants. A single answer with a single allegation was filed on behalf of all defendants which denied that they were not co-partners as alleged in the complaint. The actual intent of the answer obviously was to deny the alleged partnership and admit the claim for wages. Although the pre-trial order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nishikawa v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Young Ah Chor v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Swanson v. SiemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Mitsugi Nishikawa v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Wieder v. LorenzOregon Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mullen v. ChristiansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Wernberg v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Richey v. OenAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API