Innes v. Beauchene
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
The only question to be decided is whether the trial court erred in finding that appellant was a partner in a mining enterprise with Howard Nelson and Charles Baxter.
The complaint was one for wages and named appellant, Nelson and Baxter, d/b/a Swede Nelson Enterprises, as defendants. A single answer with a single allegation was filed on behalf of all defendants which denied that they were not co-partners as alleged in the complaint. The actual intent of the answer obviously was to deny the alleged partnership and admit the claim for wages. Although the pre-trial order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nishikawa v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Young Ah Chor v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Swanson v. SiemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Mitsugi Nishikawa v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Wieder v. LorenzOregon Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by12 opinions
- Weiner v. FleischmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Mullen v. ChristiansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Wernberg v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Richey v. OenAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Municipality of Anchorage, Police & Fire Retirement Board v. CoffeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.