Legal Opinion

Whitten v. Edward Trucking/Corporate Solutions

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 23, 2004No. CA 03-1238PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry D. Vaught, Judge.

The Workers’ Compensation Commission affirmed and adopted a decision from an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that denied benefits to the appellant, Ralph Whitten. The Commission found that appellant did not sustain a compensable injury, but rather that he suffered from a non-compensable idiopathic fall. On appeal, appellant claims that the Commission’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

Appellant, age fifty-six, contends that he sustained a com-pensable injury on February 5, 2002, after he fell at his place of employment, Edward…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Kuhn v. Majestic HotelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Williams v. L & W JANITORIAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Moore v. Darling Store FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Caffey v. Sanyo Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Swaim v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Smallwood v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Delaplaine Farm Center v. CraftonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API