Ex Parte State of New York, No. 2
Supreme Court of the United States
Prohibition to restrain proceedings in admiralty in the District Court. The case is stated in the opinion, post, 508.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
In October, 1920, Martin J. McGahan and another, as administrators of Evelyn McGahan, deceased, filed a liber in admiralty in the District Court of the United. States for the Western District of New York against the Steam Tug Queen City, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, • to recover damages alleged to have been sustained through the death of deceased by drowning, due to the negligent operation of the Queen City upon the Erie Canal, in said district. The Attorney General of the State of New York appeared specially for the purpose of questioning the jurisdiction of the court, and filed a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Klein v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- The FidelityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
3Cited by57 opinions
- Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Florida Department of State v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Republic of Mexico v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- California v. Deep Sea Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.