Legal Opinion

California v. Deep Sea Research, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1998No. 96-1400PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This action, involving the adjudication of various claims to a historic shipwreck, requires us to address the interaction between the Eleventh Amendment and the in rem admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts. Respondent Deep Sea Research, Inc. (DSR), located the ship, known as the S. S. Brother Jonathan, in California’s territorial waters. When DSR turned to the federal courts for resolution of its claims to the vessel, California contended that the Eleventh Amendment precluded a federal court from considering DSR’s claims in light of the State’s asserted rights to the Brother Jonathan…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas PTE Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Holley v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Buchwald v. University of New Mexico School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API