Daniels v. Dingman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — Hon. J. IT. Richard, Judge. Action in equity to quiet title to land. Decree for the defendant upon'her cross-bill, and plaintiffs appeal.—
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
— Plaintiffs and defendant trace their' respective claims of title to the lands in controversy through one W. R. Daniels, who is conceded to have been the owner of the fee on November 1, 1881. On that date Daniels conveyed the land to his daughter, Almira A. Dingman, by a deed which recites that, in consideration of love and affection and the sum of $500 in hand paid, the grantor does “sell and convey unto the said Almira A. Dingman for life and to her heirs at her decease the following described premises [describing the lands in controversy], the intention of this instrument being to convey…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Doyle v. AndisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bishop v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Gruwell v. GruwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Alt v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Bishop v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953