Legal Opinion

Gruwell v. Gruwell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 11, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — D. M. Anderson, . Judge. Originally, this was a suit in equity to reform a deed. By subsequent amendment, it became a suit to construe a deed and to quiet title. There was a decree for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

The controversy involves the title to 80 acres of land. This land was bought in August, 1908, by Ben and Sarah Gruwell, husband and wife. The original plaintiffs were Ben and Sarah Gruwell and their four children. The original defendants were the eight children of Ben Gruwell by a former marriage. With these defendants were joined the original grantors in the deed of 1903, who claimed no interest in the subject-matter of the controversy. The granting and habendum clauses of the deed in question were as follows:

*583“Know all men by these presents that we, Sylvester Streeby and wife, Rebecca…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wescott v. BinfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Wood v. LogueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Westcott v. MeekerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Doyle v. AndisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Sanderson v. EversonNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Switzer v. PrattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Hruby v. WaymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  3. Albright v. WineySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Hruby v. WaymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API