Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Williams

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1953No. 4-9984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is an ejectment suit brought by the appellees to recover possession of a tract of land in Arkansas County. In our view the decisive issue is whether a deed executed by W. E. Meacham in 1916 vested the fee simple in the two grantees or merely gave them life estates with remainder to their heirs. The trial court, finding that life tenancies existed, entered judgment for the plaintiffs.

In 1916 Meacham conveyed ninety-five acres to two brothers, C. H. and C. F. Williams, the granting clause containing this language: “to have and to hold to them during their natural lives with remainder after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. BlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hardage v. StroopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Lauer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Edgerton v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Daniels v. DingmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Fletcher v. HurdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Smith v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Bishop v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Fletcher v. HurdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API