Legal Opinion

State v. Jimenez

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1995No. A-94-344PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mues, Judge.

Fernando Jimenez appeals his conviction for delivery of marijuana, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(1)(a) (Cum. Supp. 1992). Jimenez alleges that he was convicted solely on the uncorroborated testimony of a “cooperating individual,” in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1439.01 (Cum. Supp. 1994). In addition, Jimenez argues that the court erred in its instructions to the jury and in failing to uphold objections regarding the prosecutor’s conduct during voir dire and responses by a witness to cross-examination at the trial. Because a witness for the State gave an…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Ronald Glen ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. JimenezNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HingstNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. HiemstraNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. JimenezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API