State v. Jimenez
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mues, Judge.
Fernando Jimenez appeals his conviction for delivery of marijuana, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(1)(a) (Cum. Supp. 1992). Jimenez alleges that he was convicted solely on the uncorroborated testimony of a “cooperating individual,” in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1439.01 (Cum. Supp. 1994). In addition, Jimenez argues that the court erred in its instructions to the jury and in failing to uphold objections regarding the prosecutor’s conduct during voir dire and responses by a witness to cross-examination at the trial. Because a witness for the State gave an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Ronald Glen ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. JimenezNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HingstNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. HiemstraNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. JimenezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995