Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 2000No. S-99-259PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.
NATURE OF CASE
Appellant Christopher D. Anderson was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, i.e., marijuana, with intent to distribute, pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-416(l)(a) (Reissue 1995). Prior to trial, Anderson filed a motion to suppress the marijuana seized from his vehicle at the time of his arrest, alleging his rights were violated because he was unreasonably detained. The district court for Hamilton County, Nebraska, overruled Anderson’s motion to suppress, from which he now appeals. On our own motion, we removed the matter to this court under our authority to regulate…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gregory Lynn Cummins, United States of America v. Timothy Akins, A/K/A Michael MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. McCullochNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BallardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BurdetteNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. FaustNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.