Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Suhr

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1979No. Civ. 9373-APublished

1Opinion of the Court

274 N.W.2d 571 (1979)

William J. CONRAD, Plaintiff,

v.

Curtis SUHR, d/b/a Suhr Motor Company, Defendant and Appellant, and

Versatile Manufacturing, Ltd., a Foreign Corporation of Canada, Defendant and Appellee.

Civ. No. 9373-A.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

January 17, 1979.

Cahill, Gunhus, Streed, Grinnell, Jeffries & Klinger, Moorhead, Minn., and Harold A. Halgrimson, Fargo, for defendant and appellee; argued by James D. Cahill, Moorhead, Minn.

Vogel, Brantner, Kelly, Knutson, Weir & Bye, Fargo, for defendant and appellant; argued by Mart R. Vogel, Fargo.

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

The basic issue in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API