Legal Opinion
People v. Nottoli
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 26, 2011No. H035902; No. H035904PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
After granting suppression motions, a magistrate dismissed complaints against Barry Jerome Nottoli (Barry) and Reid William Nottoli (Reid), father and son.1 The prosecution unsuccessfully brought a motion in the superior court “to compel the magistrate to reinstate the complaint[s]” pursuant to Penal Code section 871.5, subdivision (a).2 The principal issue in these People’s appeals is whether a warrantless search of Reid’s vehicle and the cell phone discovered in the vehicle following a traffic stop were justified as searches incident to arrest under Arizona v. Gant (2009) 556…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. WurieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- People v. SchmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. RomeoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- United States v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.