Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Hasgo Power Equipment Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of plaintiff that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying that portion of his motion seeking to compel discovery and granting that part of defendant’s cross motion seeking a protective order. The trial court is vested with broad discretion in supervising pretrial discovery (see, Farrakhan v N.Y.P. Holdings, 226 AD2d 133, 135). Although CPLR 3101 (a) is to be interpreted liberally in favor of disclosure (see, Andon v 302-304 Mott St. Assocs., 257 AD2d 37, 40), a party may not be compelled to produce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farrakhan v. N.Y.P. Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Durham Medical Search, Inc. v. Physicians International Search, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baliva v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Optic Plus Enterprises, Ltd. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. CSMC 2007-C1 OSWEGO ROAD, LLC v. KIMBROOK ROUTE 31, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Orzech v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API