Legal Opinion

Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 1999PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sullivan, J.

Plaintiff Prudencia Andón commenced this action on behalf of herself and her son Antonio to recover for personal injuries sustained by Antonio as a result of exposure to lead-based paint. The injuries allegedly suffered by the infant plaintiff include learning disability, developmental delays in speech and language, emotional behavior problems and communication skills that are below age level. The issue on this appeal is whether the IAS Court erred in granting defendants’ motion to compel an IQ examination of the infant plaintiff’s mother.

In support of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Kavanagh v. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Van Epps v. County of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Caban v. 600 E. 21st Street Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  4. Hawley v. Hasgo Power Equipment Sales, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Nieves v. 1845 7th Avenue Realty Associates, L.P.New York Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API