Baliva v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that defendant Max J. Van Benschoten sexually harassed Christine Baliva (plaintiff) while Van Benschoten and Baliva were employed by defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) and that State Farm was aware of Van Benschoten’s behavior. *1031State Farm provided plaintiffs with only some of the requested items of discovery, contending…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Servotronics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- John Blair Communications, Inc. v. Reliance Capital GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Geary v. Hunton & WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Client Server Direct, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Charter One Bank v. Midtown RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute Corp. v. Sodexo America, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Sevenson Environmental Services Inc. v. Sirius America InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.