Legal Opinion

Urland ex rel. Urland v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 24, 1987No. 86-1623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Dismissal of an action on the grounds of the statute of limitations is particularly anguishing when the victim is a minor, the injury grievous, and the alleged wrongful act repellent, if true. See O’Brien v. Eli Lilly & Co., 668 F.2d 704, 712 (3d Cir.1982) (Sloviter, J., concurring). Nonetheless, we are obliged to follow the applicable legal principles. Certainly a federal court sitting in diversity is not free to impose its notions of equity on state courts or on a state legislative body. We will affirm the entry of judgment for defendant in this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Cathcart v. Keene Industrial InsulationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Nesbitt v. Erie Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Poskin v. TD Banknorth, N.A.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Osei-Afriyie v. Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Urland v. Merrell-Dow PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. MCLAUGHLIN v. BAYER, CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API