Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Milhau

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 21, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

It is a familiar peculiarity of probate practice that no variety of proceeding evokes so great a diversity of contentions as an application for the interpretation of a testamentary document which involves a potential violation of the Statute against Perpetuities. The present is no exception to this rule, the positions of the several parties ranging from the assertion of the validity of all of the several parts of the single questioned clause to invalidity of the entire will.

Whereas learned and weighty briefs have been submitted on behalf of each of the parties to the litigation, it…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schettler v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Kalish v. . KalishNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Matter of TrevorNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. In Re the Accounting of WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. In re HornidgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HearnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of LyonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of CrespiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API